Community post
Break a Large Request Into Smaller Prompts
By Liam · Published · 2 min read
Editorial standards and correctionsA practical workflow for splitting a large AI request into planning, building, and checking steps.
One huge prompt can make the model plan, write, review, and present at once. If the output fails, I cannot tell which part caused the failure. I prefer a short chain of tasks with a check between them.
For a software feature, Prompting for a Small Feature: Requirements Before Code gives you a concrete requirements checkpoint before asking for code.
Example: a small game feature
Suppose I want to add a cooperative inventory system. “Build my inventory system” skips decisions about what players can carry and what happens when both want the same item.
I split the work:
Define behavior: “List the player actions and edge cases for a shared two-player inventory. Ask only questions that change the behavior.”
Write acceptance tests: “Turn the agreed behavior into six pass/fail scenarios. Include a full inventory and simultaneous pickup.”
Implement one slice: “Write only the pickup and capacity-check logic for the supplied language and data shape.”
Review: “Compare the code against the six scenarios. Report mismatches with evidence; do not rewrite yet.”
Each step produces an artifact the next step can use. If the first list is wrong, I fix it before it becomes code. If the code fails a test, I revise that slice rather than restarting the system.
Keep the chain connected
The danger is that each prompt forgets the earlier decisions. Carry forward a short approved specification, not the entire conversation. Name what is fixed and what remains open. For example: “Use the approved six scenarios below; do not introduce trading.”
Google’s prompt design guide discusses breaking complex tasks into simpler components. The useful principle is not “always use more prompts.” It is to create checkpoints where mistakes can be caught.
Try it: Pick a request that would take more than one afternoon. Split it into three outputs: a decision, a draft, and a check. Write one acceptance criterion for each and stop at the first failed checkpoint.
Keep learning: Prompting for a Small Feature: Requirements Before Code, How to Test a Prompt on More Than One Example, and A Tiny Evaluation Set for Your Favorite Coding Prompt.
About the author
Liam
Coder and gamer. I test prompts, share what works, and show how to improve AI results for code and creative projects.
View Liam's public profileComments (0)
Loading comments…
Keep exploring
Related from Prompt Engineering Lab
Prompt AI for a Game Idea Without Getting Generic Tropes
A game-design prompt that forces concrete player choices, failure states, and a quick playable test instead of generic story ideas.
Research Prompts That Separate Evidence From Inference
A research prompt that asks for source-backed facts, explicit inference, dates, and unresolved questions.
A Tiny Evaluation Set for Your Favorite Coding Prompt
Create a repeatable mini-benchmark for your favorite coding prompt with normal, boundary, and invalid-input cases.